Jeromy Oelker v. State of Idaho, et al.

D. Nevada

Jeromy Oelker v. State of Idaho, et al.

DecidedOctober 24, 2025

Docket2:25-cv-01589

StatusUnknown

This text of Jeromy Oelker v. State of Idaho, et al. (Jeromy Oelker v. State of Idaho, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeromy Oelker v. State of Idaho, et al., (D. Nev. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3}| Jeromy Oelker, Case No. 2:25-cv-01589-CDS-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation V. 6|| State of Idaho, et al., [ECF No. 4] 7 Defendants 8 9 Plaintiff Jeromy Oelker filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis alongside a 10] complaint seeking to “transfer and forward” cases to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Compl., ECF Nos. 1, 1-1. United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler screened 12]| Oelker’s complaint, then issued a report and recommendation (R&R). R@R, ECF No. 4. The 13]| recommends that I dismiss Oelker’s complaint because, rather than stating a new cause of 14]| action, it instead seeks to appeal the decisions in case numbers 2:25-cv-00427-JAD-BNW and 15]] 2:25-cv-00528-JAD-DJA. Id. at 2. 16 Oelker had until October 22, 2025, to file any objections to the RR. Id. at 3 (citing 17|| Local Rule IB 3-2(a) (stating that parties wishing to object to an R@R must file specific written 18|| objections with supporting points and authorities within fourteen days)); see also 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) (same). To date, Oelker has neither objected nor requested more time to do so. 20]| As no objection is filed, I adopt the R@R in full and dismiss this action with prejudice.! 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 4] is accepted and adopted in its entirety. This action is now dismissed with 23}| prejudice. The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to close this case. 24 Dated: October 24, 2025 bikin — Cristina D. Sitva 26 / ited States District Judge “TN ]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3}| Jeromy Oelker, Case No. 2:25-cv-01589-CDS-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation V. 6|| State of Idaho, et al., [ECF No. 4] 7 Defendants 8 9 Plaintiff Jeromy Oelker filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis alongside a 10] complaint seeking to “transfer and forward” cases to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Compl., ECF Nos. 1, 1-1. United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler screened 12]| Oelker’s complaint, then issued a report and recommendation (R&R). R@R, ECF No. 4. The 13]| recommends that I dismiss Oelker’s complaint because, rather than stating a new cause of 14]| action, it instead seeks to appeal the decisions in case numbers 2:25-cv-00427-JAD-BNW and 15]] 2:25-cv-00528-JAD-DJA. Id. at 2. 16 Oelker had until October 22, 2025, to file any objections to the RR. Id. at 3 (citing 17|| Local Rule IB 3-2(a) (stating that parties wishing to object to an R@R must file specific written 18|| objections with supporting points and authorities within fourteen days)); see also 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) (same). To date, Oelker has neither objected nor requested more time to do so. 20]| As no objection is filed, I adopt the R@R in full and dismiss this action with prejudice.! 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 4] is accepted and adopted in its entirety. This action is now dismissed with 23}| prejudice. The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to close this case. 24 Dated: October 24, 2025 bikin — Cristina D. Sitva 26 / ited States District Judge “TN ]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jeromy Oelker v. State of Idaho, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeromy-oelker-v-state-of-idaho-et-al-nvd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack