Jeromy Oelker v. State of Idaho, et al.

Opinion

3} Jeromy Oelker, Case No. 2:25-cv-01589-CDS-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation V. 6 State of Idaho, et al., [ECF No. 4] 7 Defendants 8 9 Plaintiff Jeromy Oelker filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis alongside a 10] complaint seeking to “transfer and forward” cases to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Compl., ECF Nos. 1, 1-1. United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler screened 12] Oelker’s complaint, then issued a report and recommendation (R&R). R@R, ECF No. 4. The 13] recommends that I dismiss Oelker’s complaint because, rather than stating a new cause of 14] action, it instead seeks to appeal the decisions in case numbers 2:25-cv-00427-JAD-BNW and 15]] 2:25-cv-00528-JAD-DJA. Id. at 2. 16 Oelker had until October 22, 2025, to file any objections to the RR. Id. at 3 (citing 17 Local Rule IB 3-2(a) (stating that parties wishing to object to an R@R must file specific written 18 objections with supporting points and authorities within fourteen days)); see also 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) (same). To date, Oelker has neither objected nor requested more time to do so. 20] As no objection is filed, I adopt the R@R in full and dismiss this action with prejudice.! 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 4] is accepted and adopted in its entirety. This action is now dismissed with 23} prejudice. The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to close this case. 24 Dated: October 24, 2025 bikin — Cristina D. Sitva 26 / ited States District Judge “TN ]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).