Jeromy Keith Morrison v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 5, 2007
Docket13-06-00316-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jeromy Keith Morrison v. State (Jeromy Keith Morrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeromy Keith Morrison v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-316-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________ ________________________________



JEROMY KEITH MORRISON, Appellant,



v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

_______________________________________________________



On appeal from the 33rd District Court
of Llano County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, Jeromy Keith Morrison, appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. On August 24, 2006, after the court reporter notified the Court that appellant had not requested a reporter's record, we abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to determine, among other things, whether appellant wished to continue the appeal. The trial court held a hearing on our abatement order on September 14, 2006. According to the record of the hearing below, appellant has decided to abandon this appeal.

Appellant's retained counsel has filed a motion to abate the appeal. According to the motion, appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal; however, the motion to abate was not signed by appellant as required by Rule 42.2(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

Based upon the trial court's findings of fact and the supplemental records filed in this court, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 2; cf. Hendrix v. State, 86 S.W.3d 762, 763-64 (Tex. App.-Waco 2002, no pet.) (applying Rule 2 to suspend requirement that counsel file written withdrawal of appeal after appellant stated on record in trial court that he desired "to drop the appeal"). Construing the motion to abate as a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. p. 42.2(a).

The appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 5th day of April, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hendrix v. State
86 S.W.3d 762 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jeromy Keith Morrison v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeromy-keith-morrison-v-state-texapp-2007.