Jerome Thomas, II v. Art Calderon
This text of 60 F.3d 835 (Jerome Thomas, II v. Art Calderon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 835
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Jerome THOMAS, II, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Art CALDERON, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 95-15351.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 26, 1995.*
Decided July 3, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Northern District of California, D.C. No. CV-93-02078-MHP; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding.
N.D.Cal.
REVERSED.
Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Art Calderon, Warden of San Quentin State Prison, appeals the district court's grant of state prisoner Jerome Thomas II's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254, concluding that the postponement of annual parole suitability hearings violated the proscription against ex post facto laws. We reverse and remand for the district court's consideration of California Dep't of Corrections v. Morales, 115 S. Ct. 1597 (1995).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 835, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25540, 1995 WL 392164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerome-thomas-ii-v-art-calderon-ca9-1995.