Jerome S. Murray v. Samuel A. De Vito
This text of 263 F.2d 496 (Jerome S. Murray v. Samuel A. De Vito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jerome S. MURRAY, Appellant,
v.
Samuel A. DE VITO, Appellee.
No. 14551.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued January 26, 1959.
Decided February 5, 1959.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Alexander Holtzoff, Judge.
Mr. Denis K. Lane, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Mr. Herman Miller, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. H. Nathaniel Blaustein, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, BAZELON, and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellee recovered a money judgment against appellant for excluding him from certain premises. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 F.2d 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerome-s-murray-v-samuel-a-de-vito-cadc-1959.