Jerome S. Murray and Grace H. Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

370 F.2d 568, 19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 407
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 6, 1967
Docket10670
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 370 F.2d 568 (Jerome S. Murray and Grace H. Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jerome S. Murray and Grace H. Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 370 F.2d 568, 19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 407 (4th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Tax Court finding that certain sales of real estate made by the husband were sales of capital assets, while other sales of real estate or of contractual interests in real estate, were of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of Murray’s business.

For the reasons stated by the Tax Court, 1 we deny the petition. Judge Kern’s opinion is entirely consistent with the subsequent decision of the Supreme Court in Malat v. Riddell, 383 U.S. 569, 86 S.Ct. 1030, 16 L.Ed.2d 102. Nothing in Malat requires a modification of the result in the Tax Court.

Affirmed.

1

. Jerome S. Murray and Grace H. Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C. Memo. 1965-148.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodman v. United States
390 F.2d 915 (Court of Claims, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
370 F.2d 568, 19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerome-s-murray-and-grace-h-murray-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca4-1967.