Jerome Paul v. American Red Cross
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-3370 ___________________________
Jerome Paul
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
American Red Cross St. Paul
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: May 17, 2023 Filed: May 22, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota resident Jerome Paul appeals after the district court1 dismissed his employment action as barred by the statute of limitations. Upon careful de novo
1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. review, we find no basis for reversal. See Smithrud v. City of St. Paul, 746 F.3d 391, 395 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing de novo whether statute of limitations bars claim). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jerome Paul v. American Red Cross (Jerome Paul v. American Red Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.