Jerome Paul v. American Red Cross

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2023·No. 22-3370·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 22-3370

Jerome Paul

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

American Red Cross St. Paul

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

Submitted: May 17, 2023

Filed: May 22, 2023

[Unpublished]

Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota resident Jerome Paul appeals after the district court1 dismissed his employment action as barred by the statute of limitations. Upon careful de novo

1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

review, we find no basis for reversal. See Smithrud v. City of St. Paul, 746 F.3d 391, 395 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing de novo whether statute of limitations bars claim). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jerome Paul v. American Red Cross, (8th Cir. 2023).

Jerome Paul v. American Red Cross (Jerome Paul v. American Red Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LeRoy Smithrud v. City of St. Paul
746 F.3d 391 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)