JEROME MACKEY v. MARK S. INCH, etc.
This text of JEROME MACKEY v. MARK S. INCH, etc. (JEROME MACKEY v. MARK S. INCH, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 5, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-579 Lower Tribunal Nos. F90-16074, F90-14863B, F90-14855A, F90-14859A, F90-14853A ________________
Jerome Mackey, Petitioner,
vs.
Mark S. Inch, etc., et al., Respondents.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.
Jerome Mackey, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent The State of Florida.
Before HENDON, LOBREE, and BOKOR, JJ.
HENDON, J. Jerome Mackey petitions for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. We deny the
petition.
Mackey was convicted in 1990 for multiple armed offenses. He has
since filed numerous unsuccessful postconviction motions attacking his
habitual offender sentences, among other issues. His last Rule 3.800
petition raising the same issue was denied in September 2019, from which
order he did not appeal. The instant postconviction petition, styled as a
habeas petition, is successive and without merit. Even if we were to
address the petition on the merits, it would be denied as the ground raised
is refuted by the record.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JEROME MACKEY v. MARK S. INCH, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerome-mackey-v-mark-s-inch-etc-fladistctapp-2021.