Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. v. State of Maryland Attorney General of the State of Maryland

73 F.3d 356, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4146, 1996 WL 4313
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 1996
Docket95-7728
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 356 (Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. v. State of Maryland Attorney General of the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. v. State of Maryland Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 73 F.3d 356, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4146, 1996 WL 4313 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

73 F.3d 356
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jerome Julius BROWN, Sr., Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
STATE of Maryland; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 95-7728.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1996.

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under gFed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are " 'mandatory and jurisdictional.' " Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on September 5, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on October 13, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robinson
361 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.
434 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F.3d 356, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4146, 1996 WL 4313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerome-julius-brown-sr-v-state-of-maryland-attorne-ca4-1996.