Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

Fourth Circuit

Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

512 F.2d 674

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 1975·No. 74-1813·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This action for damages for the alleged breach of a covenant to repair leasehold premises was tried to the court which rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Upon consideration of the *675 record, briefs and oral arguments, we are persuaded that the district court correctly applied the principles of Maryland law and that its factual findings were not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a), Fed.R. v o

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This action for damages for the alleged breach of a covenant to repair leasehold premises was tried to the court which rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Upon consideration of the *675 record, briefs and oral arguments, we are persuaded that the district court correctly applied the principles of Maryland law and that its factual findings were not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a), Fed.R. v o

Affirmed.

Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, 512 F.2d 674 (4th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

512 F.2d 674 (Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related