Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

Fourth Circuit

Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

512 F.2d 674

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 1975

Docket74-1813

StatusPublished

This text of 512 F.2d 674 (Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, 512 F.2d 674 (4th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This action for damages for the alleged breach of a covenant to repair leasehold premises was tried to the court which rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Upon consideration of the *675 record, briefs and oral arguments, we are persuaded that the district court correctly applied the principles of Maryland law and that its factual findings were not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a), Fed.R. v o

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This action for damages for the alleged breach of a covenant to repair leasehold premises was tried to the court which rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Upon consideration of the *675 record, briefs and oral arguments, we are persuaded that the district court correctly applied the principles of Maryland law and that its factual findings were not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a), Fed.R. v o

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

512 F.2d 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerome-h-hettleman-v-englehard-minerals-and-chemicals-corporation-a-ca4-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack