Jerome E. Cassell v. Edward W. Murray, Russell F. Wilson, R.C. Nixon

917 F.2d 1301, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19903, 1990 WL 174671

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 13, 1990
• Docket: 90-6513
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

917 F.2d 1301
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jerome E. CASSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Russell F. Wilson, R.C. Nixon, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6513.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 1990.
Decided Nov. 13, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-89-435-R)

Jerome E. Cassell, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome E. Cassell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cassell v. Murray, CA-89-435-R (E.D.Va. Jan. 12, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.