Jerome E. Cassell v. Edward W. Murray R.F. Wilson, Robert F. Powell, R.C. Nixon
This text of 883 F.2d 68 (Jerome E. Cassell v. Edward W. Murray R.F. Wilson, Robert F. Powell, R.C. Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
883 F.2d 68
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jerome E. CASSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY; R.F. Wilson, Robert F. Powell, R.C.
Nixon, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-7583.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 25, 1989.
Decided Aug. 9, 1989.
Jerome E. Cassell, appellant pro se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jerome E. Cassell appeals from the United States Magistrate's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985(3). Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate. Cassell v. Murray, CA-88-741-R (E.D.Va., March 24, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.1
AFFIRMED.
When construed under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Cassell's allegations also lack merit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
883 F.2d 68, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11856, 1989 WL 90611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerome-e-cassell-v-edward-w-murray-rf-wilson-robert-f-powell-rc-ca4-1989.