Jerolaman v. Foster
This text of 28 Ind. 232 (Jerolaman v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This was an appeal from an order of a judge in vacation, granting an injunction to restrain the commission of waste by a mortgagor upon the mortgaged prem[233]*233ises, after a final decree of foreclosure. It is not very clear that the complaint upon which the order for injunction was obtained was ever filed in any court; it is certain that no summons had ever issued, nor had any publication of notice. been made. There could, therefore, be no temporary injunction. It could not be granted as in the foreclosure suit, for that was terminated by a judgment. As in a new action for injunction, it could not be granted for the reason that no such suit had been, or has yet been, commenced. 2 G. & H., § 34, p. 59; id. § 138, p. 133.
The order is reversed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 Ind. 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerolaman-v-foster-ind-1867.