Jernigan v. Willoughby

48 So. 812, 159 Ala. 650, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 677
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 11, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 48 So. 812 (Jernigan v. Willoughby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jernigan v. Willoughby, 48 So. 812, 159 Ala. 650, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 677 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.

In an action of detinue, the statute (section 3781, Code 1907,) requires that the value of each article of the property sued for should [652]*652be assessed by the jury separately, if practicable, and that judgment against either party must be for the property sued for or its alternate value, etc. The judgement entry fails to recite or show a compliance with the law, as the value of the property was not assessed, nor is there any judgment for the alternate velue. — Witticks v. Keiffer, 31 Ala. 199; Lassiter v. Thompson, 85 Ala. 223, 6 South. 33; Warehouse Co. v. Johnson, 85 Ala. 178, 4 South. 643.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Dowdell, C. J., and McClellan and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crews v. Parish
105 So. 430 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Killian v. Taylor
104 So. 446 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Gwin v. Emerald Co.
78 So. 758 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Carroll v. Blackburn
68 So. 515 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Starr Piano Co. v. Baker
62 So. 549 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Hines v. Tribble
57 So. 265 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)
Kirkland v. Pilcher
57 So. 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 So. 812, 159 Ala. 650, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jernigan-v-willoughby-ala-1909.