Jernigan v. Lakehurst Motors

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Jernigan v. Lakehurst Motors

227 A.2d 505, 49 N.J. 13, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 199

DecidedMarch 20, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 227 A.2d 505 (Jernigan v. Lakehurst Motors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jernigan v. Lakehurst Motors, 227 A.2d 505, 49 N.J. 13, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 199 (N.J. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per. Ctjriam.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case in which the Division, the County Court, and the Appellate Division agreed that the petitioner was entitled to prevail. We granted certification 47 N. J. 567 (1966). Upon consideration of the matter, we are of the view that the judgment should not he disturbed. It is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—7.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per. Ctjriam.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case in which the Division, the County Court, and the Appellate Division agreed that the petitioner was entitled to prevail. We granted certification 47 N. J. 567 (1966). Upon consideration of the matter, we are of the view that the judgment should not he disturbed. It is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—7.

For reversal—None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.2d 505, 49 N.J. 13, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jernigan-v-lakehurst-motors-nj-1967.