Jernigan v. Hicks

84 So. 2d 916
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 2, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment .appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A., Rule . 38 .of the rules of this Court and it appear-. ing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion' is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument';

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, O’CONNELL and BUFORD, JJ., and DICKINSON, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jernigan v. Hicks, 84 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 1955).

84 So. 2d 916 (Jernigan v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Modernage Furniture Corp. v. Miami Rug Company
84 So. 2d 916 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)