Home/Circuit Court of North Carolina/Jermyn v. Randall

Jermyn v. Randall

1 N.C. 124
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina·Decided July 1, 1793·Published

Opinion

THE condition of the obligation was to pay 10s. weekly, secundum ordinem factum per justiciar. &c. for keeping a bastard. The defendant on oyer pleaded nullum talem ordinem fecere. The plaintiff had judgment. It would have been otherwise if it had been secundum ordinem faciendum. Dyer 196. Noy 79.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jermyn v. Randall, 1 N.C. 124 (circtnc 1793).

1 N.C. 124 (Jermyn v. Randall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.