Jerman v. Jerman
This text of 80 A.D.2d 825 (Jerman v. Jerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, for a money judgment for arrears due under the escalation clause of the parties’ separation agreement, incorporated but not merged into a decree of divorce, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 18, 1980, which, after a hearing, fixed [826]*826arrears and awarded plaintiff a counsel fee. Judgment modified by deleting the second decretal paragraph, which awarded plaintiff a counsel fee. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and case remanded to Trial Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. Although the award of a counsel fee is permissible in the instant action (see Fab'rikant v Fabrikant, 19 NY2d 154), defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing, as requested, in which he may challenge the value and extent of counsel’s claimed services (see Sadofsky v Sadofsky, 78 AD2d 520). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 A.D.2d 825, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerman-v-jerman-nyappdiv-1981.