Jermaine L. Wiley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 2016·No. 5D16-3115·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JERMAINE LAMONT WILEY, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-3115 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

________________________________/ Opinion filed December 16, 2016

3.801 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Robert J. Egan, Judge.

Jermaine Lamont Wiley, Trenton, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jermaine Wiley, appeals the summary denial of his motion for additional jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. Because the records attached to the trial court’s order do not conclusively refute Wiley’s claim, we remand for the trial court to either attach additional records refuting the claim or hold an evidentiary hearing. See Sherman v. State, 185 So. 3d 1295, 1296 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (holding that remand required where it was unclear from records attached whether defendant had

completed sentence in one case but had been held in custody thereafter pending transport to different county for disposition of second case.).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

TORPY, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jermaine L. Wiley v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Jermaine L. Wiley v. State (Jermaine L. Wiley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paul D. Sherman v. State
185 So. 3d 1295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)