Jermaine L. Wiley v. State
This text of Jermaine L. Wiley v. State (Jermaine L. Wiley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JERMAINE LAMONT WILEY,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-3115
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 16, 2016
3.801 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Robert J. Egan, Judge.
Jermaine Lamont Wiley, Trenton, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Jermaine Wiley, appeals the summary denial of his motion for additional
jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. Because the records
attached to the trial court’s order do not conclusively refute Wiley’s claim, we remand for
the trial court to either attach additional records refuting the claim or hold an evidentiary
hearing. See Sherman v. State, 185 So. 3d 1295, 1296 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (holding that
remand required where it was unclear from records attached whether defendant had completed sentence in one case but had been held in custody thereafter pending
transport to different county for disposition of second case.).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
TORPY, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jermaine L. Wiley v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jermaine-l-wiley-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.