Jermaine Cotton v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 18, 2013
Docket05-12-01724-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jermaine Cotton v. State (Jermaine Cotton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jermaine Cotton v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order entered June 18, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01724-CR No. 05-12-01731-CR No. 05-12-01732-CR

JERMAINE COTTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-51603-W, F12-51604-W, F12-70036-W

ORDER Appellant’s brief is overdue in these appeals. We also note that none of the boxes is

checked on the trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right to appeal these cases.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings

and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s records contain completed copies of

the trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right to appeal in these cases.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jermaine Cotton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jermaine-cotton-v-state-texapp-2013.