Jermaine Andrew Davis-Bey A/K/A Jermaine Davis v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 26, 2016
DocketA16D0209
StatusPublished

This text of Jermaine Andrew Davis-Bey A/K/A Jermaine Davis v. State (Jermaine Andrew Davis-Bey A/K/A Jermaine Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jermaine Andrew Davis-Bey A/K/A Jermaine Davis v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 26, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0209. JERMAINE ANDREW DAVIS-BEY v. THE STATE.

Jermaine Davis, who pled guilty to robbery and aggravated battery on August

7, 2014, and was sentenced to ten years to serve, seeks discretionary review of the

trial court’s order denying his motion to set aside a void judgment and petition for

writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum.1 In Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1)

(686 SE2d 786) (2009), however, our Supreme Court determined that “a petition to

vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal

case.” Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion, therefore, is

subject to dismissal. Harper, supra; see also Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d

150) (2010).

The issuance of a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum is based upon a

showing by a prisoner that the ends of justice require his presence. See Brand v.

State, 154 Ga. App. 781, 784 (270 SE2d 206) (1980). Because Davis was not

1 Davis appealed from the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, and we affirmed the trial court’s judgment in an unpublished opinion. See Davis-Bey v. State, Case No. A15A1107, decided September 2, 2015. authorized to collaterally attack his conviction through a motion to set aside a void

judgment, the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum is

moot.

Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 01/26/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Brand v. State
270 S.E.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Roberts v. State
690 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jermaine Andrew Davis-Bey A/K/A Jermaine Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jermaine-andrew-davis-bey-aka-jermaine-davis-v-state-gactapp-2016.