Jerline Dick Finley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Tenth Circuit

Jerline Dick Finley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

261 F.2d 112

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 12, 1958

Docket5877

StatusPublished

This text of 261 F.2d 112 (Jerline Dick Finley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jerline Dick Finley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 261 F.2d 112 (10th Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

261 F.2d 112

Jerline Dick FINLEY
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 5877.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1958.

Ram Morrison, Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioner.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Petition to review dismissed on motion of petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

261 F.2d 112

Jerline Dick FINLEY
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 5877.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1958.

Ram Morrison, Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioner.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Petition to review dismissed on motion of petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 F.2d 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerline-dick-finley-v-commissioner-of-internal-rev-ca10-1958.