Jerky Hut Corp. v. L.B. Acquisition Corp.

711 F. Supp. 564, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5530, 1989 WL 53474
District Court, D. Oregon·Decided May 17, 1989·No. Civ. No. 88-1136-FR·Published

Opinion

ORDER

FRYE, District Judge:

The matter before the court is the plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (# ).

On May 4, 1989, this court entered a minute entry granting the defendant’s motion to compel discovery from the plaintiff and instructing the parties either to present to the court an agreed upon protective order or to present to the court the wording that the parties cannot agree upon. The parties did neither.

The court deems plaintiff’s motion for a protective order moot in light of the court’s ruling of May 4, 1989. The parties shall follow the order of the court of May 4, 1989 and present to the court a mutually agreed upon protective order or present to the court the wording that is in dispute within thirty (30) days of the date of this order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for protective order (# ) is deemed moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jerky Hut Corp. v. L.B. Acquisition Corp., 711 F. Supp. 564, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5530, 1989 WL 53474 (D. Or. 1989).

711 F. Supp. 564 (Jerky Hut Corp. v. L.B. Acquisition Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.