Jeriton Curry v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 31, 2023
Docket23-6128
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jeriton Curry v. United States (Jeriton Curry v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeriton Curry v. United States, (4th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6128 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6128

JERITON LAVAR CURRY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:22-cv-00180-MOC)

Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: August 31, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeriton Lavar Curry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6128 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jeriton Lavar Curry appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his sentence by way of the savings clause

in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Curry v. United States, No. 3:22-cv-

00180-MOC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2022). ∗ We deny Curry’s pending motions. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ Curry filed his notice of appeal on December 12, 2022, more than 60 days after the district court dismissed his petition. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). However, the court did not enter its final order until March 27, 2023, when it denied Curry’s pending motion to amend. Accordingly, we conclude that Curry’s notice of appeal was timely. See Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas Porter v. David Zook
803 F.3d 694 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jeriton Curry v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeriton-curry-v-united-states-ca4-2023.