Jeremy Scholosser v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 5, 2010·No. 13-10-00252-CR·Published

Opinion

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00252-CR

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JEREMY SCHLOSSER,                                                                Appellant,

                                                             v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                 Appellee.

                            On Appeal from the 94th District Court

                                       of Nueces County, Texas.

                                       MEMORANDUM OPINION

                  Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

                               Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, Jeremy Schlosser, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he was granted a new trial on punishment and no longer wishes to appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

5th day of August, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeremy Scholosser v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Jeremy Scholosser v. State (Jeremy Scholosser v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.