JEREMY SAUNDERS v. BRYAN COLLIER, et al.

• Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
• Decided: November 13, 2025
• Docket: 2:24-cv-00250
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 13, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

JEREMY SAUNDERS, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00250 § BRYAN COLLIER, et al., § § Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Jeremy Saunders filed this prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, Plaintiff has failed to pursue this action by not complying with Court orders and by failing to update his current contact information. (D.E. 55). The undersigned also entered an Order directing Plaintiff to file an updated mailing address, to submit a filing identifying the John Doe Bus Driver along with a motion to substitute that person as a correct defendant and order service on that defendant and to file a response to the pending Motion to Dismiss on or before November 7, 2025. (D.E. 55). Plaintiff has failed to comply. Plaintiff has been admonished that it is his responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his address and to file a notice of change of address and to comply with Court orders or his case would be dismissed for want of prosecution. (D.E. 55). Therefore, it is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff’s case be DISMISSED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 1 / 3 41(b); see also Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (Sth Cir. 1997) (holding district courts have the power to sua sponte dismiss a cause of action for failure to prosecute). ORDERED on November 13, 2025.

C Jason & Libby Z United States Magistrate Judge

2/3

NOTICE TO PARTIES The Clerk will file this Memorandum and Recommendation and transmit a copy to each party or counsel. Within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after being served with a copy of the Memorandum and Recommendation, a party may file with the Clerk and serve on the

United States Magistrate Judge and all parties, written objections, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and Article IV, General Order No. 2002-13, United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. A party’s failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations in a Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation within

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after being served with a copy shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the District Court. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

3 / 3