Jeremy Oneil Fountain v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 27, 2013
Docket14-12-00938-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jeremy Oneil Fountain v. State (Jeremy Oneil Fountain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeremy Oneil Fountain v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order filed June 27, 2013

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-12-00938-CR ____________

JEREMY ONEIL FOUNTAIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1339400

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was filed on March 30, 2013. On April 24, 2013, the State filed a motion to strike appellant’s brief for failure to comply with Rule 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. On May 1, 2013, the State filed a motion to extend time to file its brief. Finding that appellant has failed to provide adequate citations to the record and to authority, we granted the State’s motion to strike and the State’s motion to extend time. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h). Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 38.9(b), the Court orders appellant to submit a brief that meets the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(b). Appellant’s amended brief is due on or before July 30, 2013, and the State’s response shall be due thirty days after appellant’s revised brief is filed.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jeremy Oneil Fountain v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeremy-oneil-fountain-v-state-texapp-2013.