Jeremy John Wells v. Warden
This text of 30 F.4th 1333 (Jeremy John Wells v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-10550 Date Filed: 04/15/2022 Page: 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-10550 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
JEREMY JOHN WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WARDEN, CLIFFORD BROWN, Unit Manager, FNU FLUKER,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-10550 Date Filed: 04/15/2022 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-10550
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cv-00097-JRH-BKE ____________________
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a ma- jority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this ap- peal will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 F.4th 1333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeremy-john-wells-v-warden-ca11-2022.