Jeremy John Wells v. Warden

30 F.4th 1333
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 15, 2022·No. 21-10550·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 21-10550 Date Filed: 04/15/2022 Page: 1 of 2

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

No. 21-10550

Non-Argument Calendar

JEREMY JOHN WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WARDEN, CLIFFORD BROWN, Unit Manager, FNU FLUKER,

Defendants-Appellees.

USCA11 Case: 21-10550 Date Filed: 04/15/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-10550

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cv-00097-JRH-BKE

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeremy John Wells v. Warden, 30 F.4th 1333 (11th Cir. 2022).

30 F.4th 1333 (Jeremy John Wells v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeremy John Wells v. Warden
58 F.4th 1347 (Eleventh Circuit, 2023)