Jeremy Jemere Bell v. State
This text of Jeremy Jemere Bell v. State (Jeremy Jemere Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jeremy Jemere Bell, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion is signed by Bell's counsel. Attached to the motion is "Appellant's Directive to Appellate Counsel," stating Bell has instructed his counsel to file a motion to dismiss the appeal. This document is signed by Bell and notarized. As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
Bailey C. Moseley
Justice
Date Submitted; January 2, 2008
Date Decided: January 3, 2008
Do Not Publish
0.5in; margin-right: 0.5in">LARRY EVERETT WHITE, JR., Appellant
On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court
Hunt County, Texas
Trial Court No. 21,453
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
On June 6, 2003, Larry Everett White, Jr., waived his right to a jury trial and pled guilty to five felony charges pending in Hunt County, Texas. This appeal concerns only White's conviction for aggravated robbery in trial court cause number 21,453. The indictment further alleged White had been previously, finally, and sequentially convicted of two additional felony offenses. After the trial court admonished White about the enhanced punishment range applicable in this case (twenty-five to ninety-nine years, or life), White pled "true" to enhancement allegations. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report. On July 24, 2003, the trial court sentenced White to fifty years' imprisonment. (There was not a negotiated plea agreement in this case.) White timely appealed his conviction and sentence to this Court.
White appealed each of his five convictions separately, but the briefs in four of the cases are substantively identical: White's counsel has reviewed the record and determined there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised; he asks that we allow him to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Since the briefs and arguments raised therein are identical in each appeal, for the reasons stated in White v. State, No. 06-03-00173-CR, we likewise affirm the trial court's judgment.
Jack Carter
Date Submitted: March 2, 2004
Date Decided: March 18, 2004
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jeremy Jemere Bell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeremy-jemere-bell-v-state-texapp-2008.