Jeremy Demone Williams v. State

Opinion

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed September 25, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01483-CR

JEREMY DEMONE WILLIAMS, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-30956-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Lang

Jeremy Demone Williams appeals his conviction, following the adjudication of his guilt, for burglary of a habitation. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(a)(1) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he

2

did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/ Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 141483F.U05

3

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JEREMY DEMONE WILLIAMS, Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.

F10-30956-M).

No. 05-14-01483-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices Evans and Whitehill participating.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered this 25th of September, 2015.