Jeremy D. Everidge v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association

654 F. App'x 479
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 25, 2016
Docket15-15041
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 654 F. App'x 479 (Jeremy D. Everidge v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeremy D. Everidge v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association, 654 F. App'x 479 (11th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy D. Everidge appeals the district court’s dismissal of his various state law claims against Wells Fargo and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). Everidge brought a diversity action in district court against Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae, alleging, inter alia, fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of contract, wrongful foreclosure, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The court granted summary judgment to Wells Fargo' on all of Everidge’s claims against it. Moreover, after denying Everidge’s requests to amend his complaint to include additional allegations against Fannie Mae, the court dismissed on the pleadings Everidge’s claims against Fannie Mae.

On appeal, Everidge argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on his claims that Wells Fargo (1) made fraudulent representations to him about insurance proceeds and a loan modification contract; (2) breached a loan modification contract; (3) violated the terms of his security deed; (4) wrongfully foreclosed his property; (5) failed to exercise good faith and fair dealing in carrying out its *480 contractual obligations as the servicer of his' mortgage loan; and (6) intentionally inflicted emotional distress on him. Ever-idge also claims that the district court erred by denying his requests to amend his complaint to include additional allegations against Fannie Mae.

After careful consideration of the record and the parties’ briefs, we find no reversible error as to any of the issues raised by Everidge. For substantially the same reasons given by the thorough opinion of the district court, we conclude that the court properly dismissed all of Everidge’s claims and appropriately denied his requests to amend his complaint. See Everidge v. Wells Fargo Bank, No. 12-00497, 2015 WL 5786738 (M.D. Ga. Sept. 29, 2015).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 F. App'x 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeremy-d-everidge-v-wells-fargo-bank-national-association-ca11-2016.