Jeremy C. MacDonald v. the State of Texas
This text of Jeremy C. MacDonald v. the State of Texas (Jeremy C. MacDonald v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-21-00390-CR __________________
JEREMY C. MACDONALD, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21-03-03529-CR __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed January
28, 2022, and the reporter’s record was filed January 26, 2022. The appellant, Jeremy
C. MacDonald, represented himself at trial with the assistance of Jarrod Walker, as
appointed stand-by counsel. On May 4, 2022, the Court granted a third extension of
time to file the appellant’s brief, noting that the extension was a “final extension.”
On May 31, 2022, the appellant requested an additional extension. On June 1, 2022,
we notified the appellant that the motion for a fourth extension had been denied and
1 that the brief must be filed by June 7, 2022. Notwithstanding this Court’s previous
notices that the brief was late, and the notice that the Court would not grant
additional extensions, the appellant’s court appointed stand-by counsel requested
additional time to prepare a brief because of health reasons.
We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing
at which a representative of the State, stand-by counsel Jarrod Walker, and the
appellant shall be present in person. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). If the appellant
is not incarcerated but fails to appear at the hearing after having been notified to do
so, or after reasonable attempts to notify him have been made, then the trial court
may enter a finding that the appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal and send
said finding to this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4). If the appellant appears
at the hearing, we direct the trial court to determine whether the appellant desires to
pursue his appeal, and if he does, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief
of the appellant has not been filed, whether the appellant is represented by appointed,
retained, volunteer, or stand-by counsel, and determine why the appellant has not
adequately responded to late notices from this Court, and whether good cause exists
for stand-by counsel Jarrod Walker to be relieved of his duties and replaced by
substitute stand-by counsel. If the appellant desires to continue with his appeal and
represent himself on appeal, we direct the trial court to admonish appellant as to the
dangers of self-representation on appeal and determine whether appellant’s apparent
2 decision to relinquish the benefits associated with counsel and to proceed pro se is
knowingly and intelligently made.
The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court
judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The supplemental reporter’s
record of the hearing and the supplemental clerk’s record containing any orders and
recommendations of the trial court judge are to be filed on or before July 27, 2022.
ORDER ENTERED June 27, 2022.
PER CURIAM
Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jeremy C. MacDonald v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeremy-c-macdonald-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.