Jeremiah Williams & Co. v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.
This text of 131 Misc. 514 (Jeremiah Williams & Co. v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issues were submitted to the jury under a charge to which no objection was made or exception taken, and that plaintiff’s counsel was entirely satisfied with the charge is further evidenced by the fact that no request was made for additional instructions. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the jiiry did not comprehend the facts or that they overlooked the law as charged by the court, and the verdict seems to be sustained by the evidence.
Order reversed, with costs, motion denied, and verdict reinstated.
All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Crain, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 Misc. 514, 226 N.Y.S. 511, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeremiah-williams-co-v-lamport-holt-ltd-nyappterm-1928.