Jeremiah Stevenson v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 28, 2008
• Docket: 02-06-00214-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

                                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                 FORT WORTH

                                        NO. 2-06-214-CR

JEREMIAH STEVENSON                                                        APPELLANT

                                                   V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

                                              ------------

        FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION^[1]

Appellant Jeremiah Stevenson entered an open plea of guilty to the charge of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon.^[2]  A jury assessed punishment at fourteen years= confinement, and the trial court sentenced Stevenson accordingly.

Appellant=s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  Counsel=s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California^[3] by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief and referencing any grounds that might arguably support the appeal.^[4]  Stevenson has also filed a pro se brief, arguing that the trial court erred by admitting hearsay evidence.

As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is frivolous.^[5]  Only then may we grant counsel=s motion to withdraw.^[6]  Because Stevenson entered an open plea of guilty, our independent review for potential error is limited to potential jurisdictional defects, the voluntariness of Stevenson=s plea, error that is not independent of and supports the judgment of guilt, and error occurring after entry of the guilty plea.^[7]

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel=s brief, and appellant=s pro se brief.  We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.^[8]  We therefore grant counsel=s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court=s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL F:  HOLMAN, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  February 28, 2008

---

^[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

^[2]Stevenson initially pled Anot guilty@ to the charged offense, and the case went to trial.  During the State=s case-in-chief, Stevenson changed his plea of Anot guilty@ to a nonnegotiated plea of Aguilty.@  For purposes of determining the scope of our independent review, we therefore treat Stevenson=s plea as an open plea of guilty.  See Lewis v. State, 911 S.W.2d 1, 4B5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (AA nonnegotiated guilty plea is conclusive as to the defendant=s guilt and waives all nonjurisdictional defects occurring prior to the guilty plea.@).

^[3]386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

^[4]See Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922B23 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 1995, no pet.).

^[5]See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays, 904 S.W.2d at 923.

^[6]See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82B83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

^[7]See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Young v. State, 8 S.W.3d 656, 666B67 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

^[8]See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827B28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).