Jeremiah Ledesma v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
DecidedJune 5, 2026
Docket03-26-00176-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jeremiah Ledesma v. the State of Texas (Jeremiah Ledesma v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeremiah Ledesma v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00176-CR

Jeremiah Ledesma, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COMAL COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF COMAL COUNTY NO. 2024CR0446, THE HONORABLE DEBORAH WIGINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was originally due April 24, 2026. On May 13, 2026, this Court

sent a notice to appellant’s counsel 1 informing him that appellant’s brief was overdue and that a

failure to file a satisfactory response by May 26, 2026, would result in the referral of this case to

the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. To

date, the Court has received no response from counsel.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct

a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether

1 The trial court appointed Joseph Garcia to represent appellant “for the duration of the pendency of these charges, including until appeals are exhausted or until the attorney is relieved of this duty or replaced by other counsel by leave of [c]ourt.” Although Garcia, following the trial in this case, filed a “motion to withdraw and motion for court to appoint appellate counsel,” the trial court never ruled on the motions. Thus, Garcia remains appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal. counsel has abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make

appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the

court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal.

Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared

and forwarded to this Court no later than June 17, 2026. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).

It is so ordered June 5, 2026.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump

Abated and Remanded

Filed: June 5, 2026

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jeremiah Ledesma v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeremiah-ledesma-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.