Jere Wood v. Michael Litten
This text of Jere Wood v. Michael Litten (Jere Wood v. Michael Litten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ October 10, 2017
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A18A0378. JERE WOOD v. MICHAEL LITTEN.
Defendant Jere Wood, the mayor of Roswell, appeals from the trial court’s order granting a writ of ouster in this quo warranto proceeding.1 The trial court ruled that an update to the Roswell city charter that became effective in 2010 rendered Wood ineligible to serve the fifth mayoral term to which he was elected in 2013. Among other arguments raised before the trial court, Wood contended that: (i) applying the new charter provision to him is unconstitutionally retroactive; and (ii) the new provision operates as an unconstitutional bill of attainder. The Supreme Court “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question.” Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657, 657 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996) (citing Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (1)). Because the trial court addressed and rejected Wood’s claims calling into question the constitutionality of the city charter, it appears that jurisdiction over this appeal may lie in the Supreme Court. See Northway v. Allen, 291 Ga. 227, 229, n. 2 (728 SE2d 624) (2012) (noting that the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction was based on the trial court’s ruling that a provision in a city charter was constitutional); see generally Jackson v. Inman, 232 Ga. 566, 568-571 (I) (207 SE2d 475) (1974) (direct appeal from trial court orders addressing, inter alia, the constitutionality of a city
1 Wood also has filed a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court; his appeal has been docketed in that Court as Case No. S18A0246. charter). As the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction, see Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, Inc., 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996), this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/10/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jere Wood v. Michael Litten, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jere-wood-v-michael-litten-gactapp-2017.