Jerartis Icon v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 22, 2025·No. 3D2025-0772·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 22, 2025.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D25-0772

Lower Tribunal No. F16-20205

Jerartis Icon,

Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge.

Jerartis Icon, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Daniel Colmenares, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Jerartis Icon appeals a March 31, 2025 order (“Order”) that strikes, as successive, Icon’s April 2, 2024 “Motion to Clarify Concurrent Sentences and Jail with Prison Credits” (“Motion”). See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801 (governing the correction of jail credit after a criminal sentence becomes final). Attached to the Order are copies of (i) Icon’s initial rule 3.801 motion, filed below on November 27, 2023, and (ii) the trial court’s December 15, 2023 order denying relief, that conclusively shows the Motion was successive. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(e) (incorporating Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(f)(5)). Because rule 3.801(d) expressly prohibits a trial court from considering a successive motion for jail credit, the trial court did not err by entering the challenged Order striking the Motion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jerartis Icon v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Jerartis Icon v. State of Florida (Jerartis Icon v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.