Jepsen v. Macri
539 A.2d 1042, 14 Conn. App. 803
This text of 539 A.2d 1042 (Jepsen v. Macri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jepsen v. Macri, 539 A.2d 1042, 14 Conn. App. 803 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
We have fully considered the claims of the defendants and find them to be without merit. The only claim which warrants further discussion is that of the named defendant that she could not be held civilly liable because of insanity. This claim is controlled by Polmatier v. Russ, 206 Conn. 229, 537 A.2d 468 (1988).
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Polmatier v. Russ
537 A.2d 468 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
539 A.2d 1042, 14 Conn. App. 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jepsen-v-macri-connappct-1988.