Jepsen v. Macri
539 A.2d 1042, 14 Conn. App. 803
Opinion
We have fully considered the claims of the defendants and find them to be without merit. The only claim which warrants further discussion is that of the named defendant that she could not be held civilly liable because of insanity. This claim is controlled by Polmatier v. Russ, 206 Conn. 229, 537 A.2d 468 (1988).
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jepsen v. Macri, 539 A.2d 1042, 14 Conn. App. 803 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).
539 A.2d 1042 (Jepsen v. Macri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Polmatier v. Russ
537 A.2d 468 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1988)