Jentzsch v. Jentzsch

105 S.W. 572, 84 Ark. 322, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 197
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 11, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 S.W. 572 (Jentzsch v. Jentzsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jentzsch v. Jentzsch, 105 S.W. 572, 84 Ark. 322, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 197 (Ark. 1907).

Opinion

Hile, C. J.

This is an appeal from so much of a divorce decree as divided the title to lots 2 and 3 of Moore’s Addition to the town of Benton between husband and wife.

They acquired three lots during coverture:

Lot 9,. block 56, of Allen’s Addition, the deed being made in the name of husband and wife jointly. Both sides concede the correctness of that deed.

And lots 2 and 3, by separate deeds, were purchased and, as found by the chancellor, were paid for by the joint earnings of both parties.

The evidence undisputably establishes the fact that the husband caused the deeds to said lots 2 and 3, block 2, Moore’s Addition, to be made from, the vendor, Moore, to Mrs. Jentzsch.

Had the property been paid for by the earnings of the husband alone, and he had caused the deed to be made in the name of the wife, there would have been no trust created, but it would have been a gift, unless the circumstances showed otherwise; and there is nothing to show otherwise here. This has long been settled by many decisions in this State, the last of which is O’Hair v. O’Hair, 76 Ark. 389.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter decree in conformity herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. Wood
172 S.W. 860 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1915)
Vaught v. Paddock
135 S.W. 331 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.W. 572, 84 Ark. 322, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jentzsch-v-jentzsch-ark-1907.