Jentry v. Hunt

13 S.C.L. 410
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 15, 1823
StatusPublished

This text of 13 S.C.L. 410 (Jentry v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jentry v. Hunt, 13 S.C.L. 410 (S.C. 1823).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Qolcach

delivered the opinion of the court:

From the view which was presented, of the facts on the trial below, the presiding judge thought that this case might form an exception to the general rule that a sheriff is liable for the acts of his deputy. (1 Douglass, 43, n. 3. 2 Term Rep. 148. y But on a view of them, the court is unanimously of opinion that the sheriff is liable, if the property be that of the plaintiffs, for any damages which she may have sustained by the unlawful taking. (See the case of Sanderson vs. Baker & Martin, (2 Black 832, and 3 Wilson 309.)

The case ought to have been submitted to the jury, and the motion is therefore granted.

Justices Richardson, Johnson, Huger, Gantt and Nott, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 S.C.L. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jentry-v-hunt-sc-1823.