Jentilucci v. Jentilucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jentilucci v. Jentilucci

1 A.D.2d 567, 767 N.Y.S.2d 644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 567 (Jentilucci v. Jentilucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jentilucci v. Jentilucci, 1 A.D.2d 567, 767 N.Y.S.2d 644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), dated September 9, 2002, which, inter alia, upon the parties’ stipulation of settlement, awarded the plaintiff maintenance in the sum of $100 per week for a period of 15 years, and child support in the sum of $164 per week.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

[568]*568The judgment of divorce incorporated but did not merge with the parties’ stipulation of settlement. On appeal, the defendant asserts, among other things, that there was an error in computing his child support obligation, and that portions of the stipulation resulted from fraud.

A party may not appeal from a judgment entered upon a stipulation (see Baecher v Baecher, 95 AD2d 841 [1983]). The defendant’s proper remedy concerning the propriety of the parties’ settlement is a motion in the Supreme Court to set aside the stipulation (see Hopkins v Hopkins, 97 AD2d 457 [1983]). Santucci, J.E, Luciano, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), dated September 9, 2002, which, inter alia, upon the parties’ stipulation of settlement, awarded the plaintiff maintenance in the sum of $100 per week for a period of 15 years, and child support in the sum of $164 per week.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

[568]*568The judgment of divorce incorporated but did not merge with the parties’ stipulation of settlement. On appeal, the defendant asserts, among other things, that there was an error in computing his child support obligation, and that portions of the stipulation resulted from fraud.

A party may not appeal from a judgment entered upon a stipulation (see Baecher v Baecher, 95 AD2d 841 [1983]). The defendant’s proper remedy concerning the propriety of the parties’ settlement is a motion in the Supreme Court to set aside the stipulation (see Hopkins v Hopkins, 97 AD2d 457 [1983]). Santucci, J.E, Luciano, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 567, 767 N.Y.S.2d 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jentilucci-v-jentilucci-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack