Jenson v. Brooke

97 A.D.3d 539, 947 N.Y.2d 328

Opinion

The defendants met their prima facie of burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted evidence establishing, prima facie, that none of the alleged injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of the plaintiffs spine constituted a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Rodriguez v Huerfano, 46 AD3d 794, 795 [2007]).

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the [540]*540defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Dillon, J.E, Balkin, Belen and Austin, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenson v. Brooke, 97 A.D.3d 539, 947 N.Y.2d 328 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

97 A.D.3d 539 (Jenson v. Brooke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.
774 N.E.2d 1197 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Gaddy v. Eyler
591 N.E.2d 1176 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Rodriguez v. Huerfano
46 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)