Jensen Vs. Jensen (Child Custody)
This text of Jensen Vs. Jensen (Child Custody) (Jensen Vs. Jensen (Child Custody)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CAROLINE JENSEN, No. 82929 Appellant, VS. SHANE JENSEN, FILED Respondent. DEC 2 2 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY DEPUry CLEM ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal. However, the stipulation is not signed by counsel of record for respondent. See NRAP 25(a)(5) (requiring that lain documents submitted to the court for filing by a represented party. . . include the original signature of at least 1 attorney of record who is an active member of the bar of this state). This court treats the stipulation as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal and grants the motion. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and fees. It is so ORDERED.
, C.J.
cc: Hon. Mary D. Perry, District Judge, Family Court Division Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge Vaccarino Law Office Pecos Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk
- 3 6.L1 73
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jensen Vs. Jensen (Child Custody), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jensen-vs-jensen-child-custody-nev-2021.