Jensen v. Western Carolina University

Fourth Circuit

Jensen v. Western Carolina University

538 F. App'x 359

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 28, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1110

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 538 F. App'x 359 (Jensen v. Western Carolina University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jensen v. Western Carolina University, 538 F. App'x 359 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Donald Jensen appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his suit primarily alleging that he was unlawfully retaliated against for speech protected by the First Amendment and the North Carolina Whistleblower Act, see N.C.G.S. § 126-84 et seq., and that he was temporarily barred from campus in violation of his rights to due process under the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and we find no error. [360]*360Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jensen v. Western Carolina Univ., 2012 WL 6728360 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Donald Jensen appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his suit primarily alleging that he was unlawfully retaliated against for speech protected by the First Amendment and the North Carolina Whistleblower Act, see N.C.G.S. § 126-84 et seq., and that he was temporarily barred from campus in violation of his rights to due process under the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and we find no error. [360]*360Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jensen v. Western Carolina Univ., 2012 WL 6728360 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 F. App'x 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jensen-v-western-carolina-university-ca4-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack