Jensen v. Thibodeaux

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jensen v. Thibodeaux

100 So. 3d 268, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19543, 2012 WL 5456701

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 9, 2012

DocketNo. 5D12-2689

StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 3d 268 (Jensen v. Thibodeaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jensen v. Thibodeaux, 100 So. 3d 268, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19543, 2012 WL 5456701 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the former husband’s motion for contempt. However, we direct the trial court to strike paragraphs three through seven of the Order on Respondent’s Motion for Rehearing and Clarification because said provisions are over-broad and lack clarity. If the trial court wishes to outline a procedure for future visitations in light of the former husband’s prior conduct, the order should be clear and comprehensive so that the parties will be aware of their respective responsibilities and the order may readily be enforced.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the former husband’s motion for contempt. However, we direct the trial court to strike paragraphs three through seven of the Order on Respondent’s Motion for Rehearing and Clarification because said provisions are over-broad and lack clarity. If the trial court wishes to outline a procedure for future visitations in light of the former husband’s prior conduct, the order should be clear and comprehensive so that the parties will be aware of their respective responsibilities and the order may readily be enforced.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 So. 3d 268, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19543, 2012 WL 5456701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jensen-v-thibodeaux-fladistctapp-2012.