Jensen v. State
Opinion
Lance Jensen appeals his judgment and sentence after he pled no contest to several charges including aggravated fleeing or eluding under section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (1997). This court lacks jurisdiction over Jensen’s attempted appeal of his judgment attacking the constitutionality of section 316.1935(2). Jensen failed to raise this issue below, therefore Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A) does not afford him review. Further, Jensen’s Point I on appeal does not fit within rule 9.140(b)(2)(B). Thus we strike Jensen’s Point I on appeal.
[148]*148As to Jensen’s sentence, the state concedes Jensen’s probation order must be remanded to conform condition 15 of Jensen’s written probation order to the court’s oral pronouncement prohibiting Jensen from drinking alcohol or using any illicit drugs. Kelly v. State, 414 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (recognizing a trial court’s oral pronouncement controls over written sentence order).
DISMISSED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
705 So. 2d 147 (Jensen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.