Jensen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jensen v. State

705 So. 2d 147, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1381, 1998 WL 64027

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 1998

DocketNo. 97-1571

StatusPublished

This text of 705 So. 2d 147 (Jensen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jensen v. State, 705 So. 2d 147, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1381, 1998 WL 64027 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lance Jensen appeals his judgment and sentence after he pled no contest to several charges including aggravated fleeing or eluding under section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (1997). This court lacks jurisdiction over Jensen’s attempted appeal of his judgment attacking the constitutionality of section 316.1935(2). Jensen failed to raise this issue below, therefore Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A) does not afford him review. Further, Jensen’s Point I on appeal does not fit within rule 9.140(b)(2)(B). Thus we strike Jensen’s Point I on appeal.

[148]*148As to Jensen’s sentence, the state concedes Jensen’s probation order must be remanded to conform condition 15 of Jensen’s written probation order to the court’s oral pronouncement prohibiting Jensen from drinking alcohol or using any illicit drugs. Kelly v. State, 414 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (recognizing a trial court’s oral pronouncement controls over written sentence order).

DISMISSED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lance Jensen appeals his judgment and sentence after he pled no contest to several charges including aggravated fleeing or eluding under section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (1997). This court lacks jurisdiction over Jensen’s attempted appeal of his judgment attacking the constitutionality of section 316.1935(2). Jensen failed to raise this issue below, therefore Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A) does not afford him review. Further, Jensen’s Point I on appeal does not fit within rule 9.140(b)(2)(B). Thus we strike Jensen’s Point I on appeal.

[148]*148As to Jensen’s sentence, the state concedes Jensen’s probation order must be remanded to conform condition 15 of Jensen’s written probation order to the court’s oral pronouncement prohibiting Jensen from drinking alcohol or using any illicit drugs. Kelly v. State, 414 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (recognizing a trial court’s oral pronouncement controls over written sentence order).

DISMISSED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 So. 2d 147, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1381, 1998 WL 64027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jensen-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack