Jensen v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Jensen v. Maass

964 P.2d 293, 155 Or. App. 642, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1492

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 2, 1998

Docket93C13718; CA A91045

StatusPublished

This text of 964 P.2d 293 (Jensen v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jensen v. Maass, 964 P.2d 293, 155 Or. App. 642, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1492 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Our review is limited to errors of law, including whether the facts found by the post- conviction court are supported by the record. Yeager v. Maass, 93 Or App 561, 564, 763 P2d 184 (1988), rev den 307 Or 340 (1989).

Petitioner contends on appeal that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his lawyer failed to advise him, before he agreed to a stipulated facts trial, that he could receive consecutive sentences and a gun minimum sentence. Turczynski v. Grill, 134 Or App 351, 895 P2d 787 (1995), establishes that the court properly rejected the claim.

We reject petitioner’s remaining assignments of error without discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI