Jensen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
This text of 240 A.D. 1008 (Jensen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the plaintiffs proved a prima facie case of negligence against the defendant. Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for affirmance on authority of Kelly v. Otterstedt (80 App. Div. 398); Norton v. Hudner (213 Mass. 257).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jensen-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nyappdiv-1933.