Jenny Day and Guillermo Moreno v. Classic Autoplex
This text of Jenny Day and Guillermo Moreno v. Classic Autoplex (Jenny Day and Guillermo Moreno v. Classic Autoplex) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued December 31, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00744-CV ——————————— JENNY DAY AND GUILLERMO MORENO, Appellants V. CLASSIC AUTOPLEX, Appellee
On Appeal from the 212th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 17-CV-0081
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Jenny Day and Guillermo Moreno, have neither paid the
required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041;
Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject
to dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jenny Day and Guillermo Moreno v. Classic Autoplex, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenny-day-and-guillermo-moreno-v-classic-autoplex-texapp-2019.