Jennings v. Sunshine Biscuit Co.

263 So. 2d 851, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6683
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 1972·No. No. P-443·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Baro v. Wilson (Fla.App.1961) 134 So.2d 843; Perdue v. Copeland (Fla.1969) 220 So.2d 617; Edwards v. Donaldson (Fla.App.1958) 103 So.2d 256; Falnes v. Kaplan (Fla.1958) 101 So.2d 377.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and WIGGIN-TON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jennings v. Sunshine Biscuit Co., 263 So. 2d 851, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6683 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

263 So. 2d 851 (Jennings v. Sunshine Biscuit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Falnes v. Kaplan
101 So. 2d 377 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Baro v. Wilson
134 So. 2d 843 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Perdue v. Copeland
220 So. 2d 617 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
Edwards v. Donaldson
103 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)