Jennings v. State

151 S.W. 1050, 68 Tex. Crim. 613, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 665
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 11, 1912·No. No. 2120.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

— Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at ten years confinement in the State penitentiary.

Accompanying the record is a letter from appellant’s attorney stating that it is appellant’s desire to withdraw his appeal. The rules of this court provide that such request must be signed in person and sworn to by the person convicted of crime. However, there is no statement of facts accompanying the record, and there is no question raised in the motion for new trial that we can review under such circumstances.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jennings v. State, 151 S.W. 1050, 68 Tex. Crim. 613, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 665 (Tex. 1912).

151 S.W. 1050 (Jennings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hypolite v. State
647 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Ex Parte Trisler
605 S.W.2d 619 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Gilliam v. State
177 S.W.2d 782 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1944)